Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:59
I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.
But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.
So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.
Renck: If J.K. Dobbins stays healthy, he’ll be reason Broncos win AFC West - The Denver Post
Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.
It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.
Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).
Kubica Quickest in Opening Le Mans Test Session - Sportscar365
At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).
So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).
To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.
Why do creationists ask for proof of evolution and then ignore the answers?